{"id":29316,"date":"2024-03-20T14:49:31","date_gmt":"2024-03-20T18:49:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.carh.org\/?p=29316"},"modified":"2024-03-20T14:57:50","modified_gmt":"2024-03-20T18:57:50","slug":"final-rule-multifamily-housing-section-538-guaranteed-rural-rental-housing-prioritization-criteria","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.carh.org\/final-rule-multifamily-housing-section-538-guaranteed-rural-rental-housing-prioritization-criteria\/","title":{"rendered":"Final Rule – Multifamily Housing Section 538 Guaranteed Rural Rental Housing Prioritization Criteria"},"content":{"rendered":"

CARH\u2019S BROADCAST E-MAIL \u2013 Regulatory Update
\n<\/strong>
\nMarch 20, 2024<\/strong><\/p>\n

Today, Rural Development\u2019s Office of Multifamily Housing issued the following Stakeholder Announcement:<\/em><\/p>\n

The Rural Housing Service Office of Multifamily Housing (MFH) published a final rule on March 19, 2024 (Federal Register<\/em><\/a><\/strong>)<\/span><\/a> to amend the current regulation for the MFH Section 538 Guaranteed Rural Rental Housing Program (GRRHP).\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

While the 538 program is authorized by the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, the 538 program wasn\u2019t created until 1996. This regulatory change aligns the prioritization criteria for applications in the Section 538 regulations with those identified in the Housing Act of 1949.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

The 538 regulations, over time, were amended to include certain priority criteria, many of which are now outdated. The regulatory change aligns the priority language in the regulation with the language in the statute, removes the old regulatory-required priorities, and extends the Secretary the ability to establish and implement any priorities through Federal Register<\/em> Notice.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

The purpose of the regulatory change is to harmonize the Section 538 Regulation with the Statute, specifically regarding priority language. This Regulatory Change accomplishes two main objectives:\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

It eliminates outdated priority language, such as bedroom count and lower interest rate, which no longer align with the highest RHS priorities, including but not limited to Advancing Racial Justice, Place-Based Equity, and Opportunity – Ensuring all rural residents have equitable access to RD programs and benefits from RD funded projects.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0It provides greater flexibility to allow RHS to ensure that properties meet their full affordability contract period and are able to adjust to market conditions and trends.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cWith this flexibility, RHS will update its Section 538 Notice in the Federal Register<\/em> in the summer of 2024. This update will include addressing the potential loss of affordability through Qualified Contract provisions, using priority points for investments in projects that waive its Qualified Contract provision, ensuring the 30-year affordability period envisioned by the LIHTC program,\u201d said Joaquin Altoro, Rural Housing Administrator.<\/p>\n

This and other regulations will be discussed at CARH\u2019s upcoming Annual Meeting & Legislative Conference on June 24-26, 2024. Click here<\/a><\/strong> to register.<\/p>\n

For other news and information affecting the affordable rural housing industry, please visit the Newsroom on CARH\u2019s website, www.carh.org<\/a><\/strong>.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

CARH\u2019S BROADCAST E-MAIL \u2013 Regulatory Update March 20, 2024 Today, Rural Development\u2019s Office of Multifamily Housing issued the following Stakeholder Announcement: The Rural Housing Service Office of Multifamily Housing (MFH) published a final rule on March 19, 2024 (Federal Register) to amend the current regulation for the MFH Section 538 Guaranteed Rural Rental Housing Program…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":263,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_cbd_carousel_blocks":"[]","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-29316","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","category-1","description-off"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.carh.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29316","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.carh.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.carh.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.carh.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/263"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.carh.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=29316"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.carh.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29316\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":29319,"href":"https:\/\/www.carh.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29316\/revisions\/29319"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.carh.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=29316"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.carh.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=29316"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.carh.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=29316"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}